Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability
Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability

Information Brief on Weighted Caseload Methods of Assessing Judicial Workload and Certifying the Need for Additional Judges

Report 97-67, March 1998




Report Summary

  • The Supreme Court should adopt a weighted caseload system for assessing judicial workload and certifying the need for additional judges. (See page 2, column 2.)
  • Adopting a weighted caseload system would significantly improve the accuracy of assessments of the workload of the judicial branch. As a result, the Supreme Court, the Legislature, and local governments could make more informed decisions about the use and distribution of judicial resources. (See page 2, column 2.)
  • Experts estimate that implementing a weighted caseload system would cost approximately $52,000. Similar costs would be incurred every four years when the weights were updated. (See page 2, column 1.)
  • A weighted caseload system would assist the Court in implementing performance-based budgeting for the judicial branch. (See page 2, column 2.)


Related Reports
  1. Courts Improve Caseload System; Need to Address Supplemental Resources
    Report 99-38 March 2000
  2. Review of the Efficiency of the Two-Tiered Trial Court System and the Process for Certifying Judges
    Report 97-36 January 1998
Copies of this report in print or alternate accessible format may be obtained by email OPPAGA@oppaga.fl.gov, telephone (850) 488-0021, or mail 111 W. Madison St., Room 312 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1475.
Copies of this report in print or alternate accessible format may be obtained by email OPPAGA@oppaga.fl.gov, telephone (850) 488-0021, or mail 111 W. Madison St., Room 312 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1475.
judicial, crime, judicial, delphi, case weights, caseload weights, judge workload, need for judges, trial courts